MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410398732 · doi:10.3390/pr13051528

Long Short-Term Memory Networks for State of Charge and Average Temperature State Estimation of SPMeT Lithium–Ion Battery Model

2025· article· en· W4410398732 on OpenAlexafffund
B Chevalier, Junyao Xie, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

VenueProcesses · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsState of chargeTerm (time)Lithium (medication)Battery (electricity)Lithium-ion batteryState (computer science)IonMaterials scienceEstimationCharge (physics)Long short term memoryComputer scienceThermodynamicsPhysicsAlgorithmEngineeringPsychologyArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium–ion batteries are the dominant battery type for emerging technologies in the efforts to slow climate change. Accurate and quick estimations of state of charge (SOC) and internal cell temperature are vital to battery-management systems to enable the effective operation of portable electronics and electric vehicles. Therefore, a long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent-neural network is proposed which completes the state estimation of SOC and internal average cell temperature (Tavg) of lithium–ion batteries under varying current loads. The network is trained and evaluated using data compiled from a newly developed extended single-particle model coupled with a thermal dynamic model. Results are promising, with root mean square values typically under 2% for SOC and 1.2 K for Tavg, while maintaining quick training and testing times. In addition, we examined a comparison of a single-feature versus multi-feature network, as well as two different approaches to data partitioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcessesSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207