MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410404687 · doi:10.1116/6.0004517

Integration of <i>in situ</i> field-directed sputter sharpening in Scienta Omicron systems

2025· article· en· W4410404687 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stephanie D. Lough, Megan Cowie, Adam Bottomley, Brandon Blue, Masa Ishigami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrategic Innovation Fund
KeywordsSharpeningMaterials scienceSputteringIn situField (mathematics)Sputter depositionField electron emissionOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyEngineering physicsThin filmMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a specialized adapter to enable a field-directed sputter sharpening (FDSS) of SPM tips in a commonly used ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscope (STM). The adapter is for a Scienta Omicron low-temperature STM system equipped with a typical Ar+ sputtering source in an adjoining sample preparation chamber. It interfaces directly with the Omicron transfer plate and tip holder, thereby allowing the FDSS technique to be implemented with minimal additional hardware. We have used C60 molecules to benchmark the performance of the in situ sharpening of electrochemically etched W tips, showing nearly an order of magnitude reduction in the apparent tip diameter. The design of the FDSS adapter presented in this paper enables in situ tip sharpening and demonstrates that the FDSS technique can be applied to produce tips suitable for high-asperity molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and PhenomenaSame topicIon-surface interactions and analysisFrench-language works237,207