MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410407959 · doi:10.36985/j6abjs60

Peningkatan Kapasitas UMKM Melalui Implementasi Sistem Pembayaran Digital (Qris) Di Kota Pematangsiantar

2025· article· id· W4410407959 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Ade Kurnia Harahap

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sapangambei Manoktok Hitei · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kapasitas pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) di Kota Pematangsiantar melalui implementasi sistem pembayaran digital berbasis QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard). Berdasarkan data tahun 2023, terdapat lebih dari 23.000 pelaku UMKM aktif di kota ini, namun hanya sekitar 30% yang telah mengadopsi sistem pembayaran digital. Fakta ini mencerminkan adanya kesenjangan antara potensi ekonomi lokal dan tingkat adopsi teknologi keuangan yang tersedia. Melalui pendekatan deskriptif-kualitatif, kegiatan ini mencakup tahapan sosialisasi, pelatihan, dan pendampingan langsung terhadap 45 pelaku UMKM dari sektor perdagangan, kuliner, dan jasa. Hasilnya menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan dalam literasi keuangan digital, kesiapan adopsi teknologi, serta efisiensi transaksi bisnis harian para mitra. Sebanyak 80% peserta berhasil mengaktifkan QRIS dan menggunakannya secara aktif. Temuan ini menguatkan bahwa adopsi QRIS tidak hanya mendukung efisiensi dan transparansi usaha, tetapi juga memperkuat inklusi keuangan serta daya saing UMKM dalam ekosistem ekonomi digital. Meskipun demikian, beberapa tantangan tetap muncul, terutama terkait keterbatasan perangkat digital, akses internet, dan resistensi awal dari pelaku usaha yang belum terbiasa dengan teknologi. Oleh karena itu, keberlanjutan program digitalisasi UMKM perlu didukung oleh strategi pendampingan berkelanjutan, sinergi multipihak, serta kebijakan publik yang berpihak pada transformasi ekonomi lokal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sapangambei Manoktok HiteiSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207