MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410409331 · doi:10.1080/17597269.2025.2479925

Photocatalytic degradation on Sulphur–Nitrogen Co-Doped Fe <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> surface and enhanced nanostructure design using RERNN-FFO approach for methylene blue adsorption

2025· article· en· W4410409331 on OpenAlexaff
Anusuya Devi. V S, Ashwani Kumar, Rakesh Chandrashekar, Jagannath J. Kadam

Bibliographic record

VenueBiofuels · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicNanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethylene blueDegradation (telecommunications)AdsorptionNanostructurePhotocatalysisSulfurNitrogenMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryDopingChemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyCatalysisMetallurgyOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fe2O3 is an exceptional substance that possesses distinct properties, including high stability, oxidising power, affordability, environmental friendliness, availability, and some visible light qualities. The paper presents a unique technique for the Design of Nanostructure Surface for Adsorption and Photo catalysis of Methylene Blue termed Hybrid RERNN-FFO in order to overcome this problem. The proposed hybrid technique is the joint execution of both the Recalling Enhanced Recurrent Neural Network (RERNN) and Flying Foxes Optimization (FFO). Hence, it is named as RERNN-FFO. The major objective of the proposed technique is to accurately predict the dye removal effectiveness. The RERNN is utilized to predict the efficiency of the dye removal and eliminate its dependency on neuron count and FFO is utilized to optimize the RERNN’s parameters. The proposed strategy was executed in the MATLAB platform and compared with other existing strategies like Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Network (CGCNN), Deep Neural Network (DNN)and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The proposed method is more efficient than current approaches and achieves an impressive 99% dye removal efficiency. The findings indicate that, in comparison to alternative methods, this strategy reduces MSE by 0.048% and increases R-squared by 0.94%, demonstrating its superior performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiofuelsSame topicNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsFrench-language works237,207