Breeding potential of cultivated lentil for increased protein and amino acid concentrations in the Northern Great Plains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rising demand for plant‐based proteins has intensified interest in pulse crops due to their high protein concentration. Few studies have evaluated protein and amino acid composition or variability in cultivated lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.). We evaluated protein and amino acid composition using near‐infrared reflectance spectroscopy in a diversity panel grown in four site‐years in Saskatchewan, Canada, followed by genome‐wide association analyses with phenology‐related traits as covariates. We found little correlation between protein concentration and days from sowing to flowering, region of origin, cotyledon color, or seed size. Reproductive period was correlated with protein concentration, however. We also observed variability among environments and more variability within market classes than among them. We demonstrate the potential for breeders to identify adapted germplasm and select for increased protein and amino acid concentration and quality. We were able to identify several molecular markers for use in marker‐assisted breeding to select for protein concentration or quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".