CRISPR-BEasy: a free web-based service for designing sgRNA tiling libraries for CRISPR-dependent base editing screens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CRISPR-dependent base editing (BE) enables the modeling and correction of genetic mutations at single-base resolution. Base editing screens, where point mutations are queried en masse, are powerful tools to systematically draw genotype-phenotype associations and characterise the function of genes and other genomic elements. However, the lack of user-friendly web-based tools for designing base editing screens can hinder broad technology adoption. Here, we introduce CRISPR-BEasy (https://crispr-beasy.cerc-genomic-medicine.ca), a free, automated web-based server that streamlines the creation of single guide (sg)RNA tiling libraries for base editing screens. Researchers can provide their genes or genomic features of interest, their base editors of choice, and target sequences to act as positive and negative controls. The server designs and annotates sgRNA libraries by integrating custom code with publicly available tools such as crisprVerse and Ensembl's Variant Effect Predictor. CRISPR-BEasy provides downloadable results, including sgRNA on/off-target scores, predicted mutational outcomes per base editor, and intuitive interactive visualizations for data quality assessment. CRISPR-BEasy also provides a separate tool that assembles sgRNA libraries into oligonucleotides for cloning following the detailed protocol documented in the searchable web server manual. Together, CRISPR-BEasy ensures the seamless design of cloning-ready sgRNA libraries, seeking to democratise access to base editing screening technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.055 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".