MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410422000 · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/add9c1

Majorana tensor decomposition: a unifying framework for decompositions of fermionic Hamiltonians to linear combination of unitaries

2025· article· en· W4410422000 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantum Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency
KeywordsMAJORANADecompositionTensor decompositionTensor (intrinsic definition)Mathematical physicsPhysicsMathematicsTheoretical physicsPure mathematicsApplied mathematicsQuantum mechanicsChemistryFermion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Linear combination of unitaries (LCU) decompositions have become a key tool for encoding operators on quantum computers, enabling efficient implementations of arbitrary operators. In particular, LCU methods provide a way to encode the electronic structure Hamiltonian into quantum circuits. Over the years, various decomposition techniques have been developed for this purpose. Here, we introduce the Majorana tensor decomposition, a framework that unifies existing LCU approaches and introduces novel decompositions using low-rank tensor factorizations. We benchmark a range of decomposition techniques on small molecular systems and hydrogen chains of increasing sizes, evaluating their performance across different LCU methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it