MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Change in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Cerebral Ventricular Shunt Failure in Children

2025· article· en· W4410432674 on OpenAlexafffund
Adrienne L. Davis, Mark O. Tessaro, Suzanne Schuh, Armaan K. Malhotra, Maya Sumaida, Magali Gauthey, Onaiza Zahid, Sara Breitbart, Helen M. Branson, Suzanne Laughlin, Brian W. Hanak, Abhaya V. Kulkarni

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Network Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticHydrocephalusNeurosurgeryShunt (medical)Outpatient clinicSurgeryProspective cohort studyEmergency departmentInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Ocular point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) may be a clinically useful method to evaluate shunt dysfunction for children with hydrocephalus presenting to the emergency department (ED). Objective: To evaluate whether a change in the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) from prior asymptomatic baseline was associated with shunt failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: Participants in this prospective single-center observational cohort study at a tertiary care children's hospital were enrolled from January 5, 2018, to March 2, 2022. Children 18 years or younger with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts were consecutively recruited during routine asymptomatic visits in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic. The institution sees approximately 1000 children with shunts. Children with comorbid eye pathologic conditions known to increase the ONSD were excluded, as were those with shunt interventions between baseline and symptomatic ocular POCUS. Data analysis was completed in May 2024. Exposures: Baseline ocular POCUS was performed on asymptomatic children with CSF shunts recruited in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic; a second ocular POCUS was performed if the patient subsequently presented to the ED with symptoms of shunt failure. Change in ONSD from prior asymptomatic baseline to symptomatic presentation was the main study exposure. Main Outcomes and Measures: Shunt failure was defined as intraoperative confirmation of inadequate CSF flow through the shunt system associated with identifiable shunt complications, including catheter or valve obstruction, shunt tubing fracture or disconnection, or proximal catheter migration out of the ventricle within 96 hours from presentation to the ED. Results: Seventy-six pairs of baseline and symptomatic ultrasonograms from 58 patients (mean [SD] age, 6.6 [4.7] years; 36 of 58 boys [62%]) were included. Twenty patients (35%) had 2 or more prior shunt revisions, and 29 (50%) had communicating hydrocephalus. The primary outcome of intraoperatively confirmed shunt failure was observed in 14 of 76 ED patient presentations (18%). The mean (SD) change in ONSD among patients with shunt failure was 0.89 (0.66) mm vs 0.16 (0.40) mm among patients without shunt failure (mean difference, 0.73 mm [95% CI, 0.47-0.99 mm]; P < .001). The odds of full shunt failure were 1.4 times higher (95% CI, 1.21-1.78; P < .001) for every 0.1-mm increase in ONSD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86, with an optimal cutoff of 0.4 mm or more, yielding a sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.73, positive predictive value of 0.43, and negative predictive value of 0.98, for a disease prevalence of 15%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.39 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.10. Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center, prospective cohort study of symptomatic children with CSF shunts, a change in ONSD measured by ocular POCUS was associated with shunt failure. A change in ONSD from prior asymptomatic baseline to symptomatic presentation of less than 0.4 mm identified a population at low risk of true shunt failure. Further research is warranted to validate these findings, the presented change in ONSD threshold, and to risk stratify low-risk patients for cross-sectional neuroimaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Network OpenSame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207