MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410433254 · doi:10.2196/69610

Reduction of Salt and Sugar Contents in Canteen Foods and Intakes By Students and Staff at a Malaysian Higher Education Institution: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

2025· article· en· W4410433254 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yook Chin Chia, Yee‐How Say, Maong Hui Cheng, Felicia Fei‐Lei Chung, Tze Pheng Lau, Pei Boon Ooi

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)PreprintInstitutionMedicineMedical educationPsychologyComputer scienceSociologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: University students and staff members, especially those who frequently eat out and spend considerable time on campus, form a crucial demographic facing challenges related to high salt and sugar intake in out-of-home food. Recognizing the high prevalence of eating out among these populations, it is imperative to understand the salt and sugar consumption levels of campus communities. OBJECTIVE: This protocol describes the rationale and design of a 3-part cross-sectional and longitudinal interventional study to reduce salt and sugar contents in canteen foods and intakes among students and staff at Sunway University and Sunway College in Malaysia. METHODS: First, the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) and perception, barriers, and enablers (PBEs) of salt and sugar intake and reduction were assessed among students and staff (part 1 of the study). Second, the KAPs and PBEs of salt, oil, and sugar reduction were assessed among canteen staff (part 2 of the study). Third, a longitudinal interventional study was conducted by implementing a campus-wide executive order to reduce salt and sugar in all foods sold on campus (part 3 of the study). The salt and sugar contents of selected foods were measured at baseline and at 3 months and 6 months postreduction. Participants who eat frequently on campus were selected as the intervention group, while those who do not comprised the control group. All participants had their urine electrolytes and body compositions measured and recorded 24-hour dietary intakes for 2 weekdays and 1 weekend at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after salt and sugar reduction. RESULTS: The study protocols were approved by the institutional review board of Sunway University (SUREC 2024/029 and SUREC 2024/040). Recruitment for the cross-sectional studies began in May 2024, while that for the longitudinal intervention study began in June 2024. The 6-month intervention began in September 2024 immediately after the official launch of the campus-wide executive order to reduce salt and sugar. We targeted recruitment of 1000, 50, and 300 participants for parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. We anticipate reduced dietary salt and sugar intakes by 30% and 50%, respectively (World Health Organization targets), and beneficial health effects on the participants. CONCLUSIONS: The insights gained from this study will help to create a healthier food environment, benefitting individuals who regularly eat out, especially at the workplace. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06473038; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06473038. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/69610.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.270
GPT teacher head0.630
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207