MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410444008 · doi:10.46265/genresj.zfee2261

Morphological and biochemical characterization of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) germplasm grown in Central Ethiopia

2025· article· en· W4410444008 on OpenAlexafffund
Ermias Estifanos, Tileye Feyissa, Kassahun Tesfaye, Alemu Lencho, Christina Eynck

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetic Resources · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaAmbo University
KeywordsGermplasmBrassica carinataBrassicaBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) shows potential for diverse applications, including as leafy greens, green manure and oilseed feedstock for biofuels. This study evaluated the seed and oil production potential and phenotypic diversity of 49 B. carinata accessions through trials conducted in 2018 at the Holeta and Asela Research Centers in Ethiopia, using a lattice design. Data were collected on phenological, morphological, agronomic and seed quality traits. The analysis revealed significant variability across most traits, except for silique width and oil and protein content at Asela, and main raceme length and total glucosinolate content at Holeta. Combined analysis showed significant genotype-by-location interactions for flowering date, seeds per silique and seed yield per hectare, indicating a strong environmental influence on these traits. Phenotypic and genotypic correlation analyses identified strong positive correlations between leaf traits and phenology, seed yield and seed quality, while oil content was negatively associated with protein and glucosinolate content. Principal component analysis identified five components at Asela and six components at Holeta with eigenvalues greater than one, explaining over 77% of the total variation at both locations. Key traits such as plant height, seed yield and oil content contributed significantly to these principal components. Cluster analysis grouped the accessions into three clusters based on distinct trait combinations. Accessions 17545, 21373, 24203 and 24495 consistently performed well across multiple traits across sites, making them strong candidates for breeding programmes focused on improving seed yield and quality in B. carinata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenetic ResourcesSame topicNitrogen and Sulfur Effects on BrassicaFrench-language works237,207