CO<sub>2</sub>‐Responsive Smart Wood Scaffold for Natural Organic Matter Removal without Secondary Pollution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ensuring drinking water safety remains a critical challenge, particularly when treating complex water sources, due to secondary pollution caused by active chemical additives. Herein, a novel CO 2 ‐responsive smart wood scaffold that leverages non‐toxic CO 2 activation is developed to achieve highly efficient removal of carcinogenic natural organic matter (NOM) and broad‐spectrum microbial disinfection without requiring additional chemical agents. Unlike conventional water purification techniques that face a safety‐efficacy trade‐off, the multi‐stage CO 2 ‐responsive wood scaffold offers exceptional tunability in NOM abatement across diverse environmental conditions, including variable water chemistry, NOM composition, high salinity, and real‐world water sources. The purified water meets stringent drinking water standards (e.g., UV 254 reduction, dissolved organic carbon removal, and bacterial elimination). It is found that the highly efficient NOM adsorption mainly originates from the strong and stable CO 2 ‐triggered cation−π interaction between the scaffold surface and aromatic NOM groups, as revealed via high‐resolution mass spectrometry and direct intermolecular force measurements. This ecofriendly and contamination‐free CO 2 ‐responsive strategy provides a transformative approach to overcoming secondary pollution challenges in water purification, offering a scalable and sustainable platform for environmental applications and beyond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it