MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410451772 · doi:10.5376/tgmb.2024.14.0015

The Role of Auxin Signal Transduction in the Differentiation of Fruit Tree Branches

2024· article· en· W4410451772 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhongmei Hong, Wenzhong Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueTree Genetics and Molecular Breeding · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuxinSignal transductionTree (set theory)BiologyCell biologyBotanyTransduction (biophysics)GeneticsGeneMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phytohormone auxin plays a pivotal role in the differentiation and development of fruit tree branches. This study synthesizes recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of auxin signal transduction and its impact on branch differentiation. Auxin's influence on plant growth and development is mediated through complex signaling pathways involving auxin response factors (ARFs) and Aux/IAA proteins, which regulate gene expression and cellular responses. The interaction between auxin and other phytohormones, such as gibberellic acid (GA), further modulates fruit development and branch differentiation. This review highlights the molecular and genetic evidence supporting the role of auxin in these processes, emphasizing the importance of auxin signaling in the regulation of cell division, expansion, and differentiation in fruit trees. The findings underscore the complexity of auxin-mediated responses and the potential for manipulating auxin pathways to improve fruit tree growth and productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTree Genetics and Molecular BreedingSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207