Cloning, Functional Analysis, and Breeding Application of the Powdery Mildew Resistance Gene <i>MlWE74</i> in Wheat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The MlWE74 gene, a novel powdery mildew resistance gene, has garnered widespread attention for its potential to enhance disease resistance in wheat. This study provides a comprehensive summary of the positional cloning, functional analysis, and breeding application of the wheat powdery mildew resistance gene MlWE74 . A systematic analysis of the cloning strategy, functional mechanisms, and its application in molecular breeding was conducted, evaluating its contributions to disease resistance improvement and its practical value in modern wheat breeding. The findings reveal that the MlWE74 gene holds significant potential for use in wheat disease resistance breeding. Its functional analysis and breeding applications will further advance the development of resistant wheat varieties. Future research should focus on in-depth studies of the MlWE74 gene, combining gene editing and multi-gene resistance strategies to enhance its breeding efficiency. The successful cloning and functional analysis of the MlWE74 gene offer new perspectives and tools for the development of powdery mildew-resistant wheat varieties. With the advancement of genome selection, marker-assisted breeding, and gene editing technologies, the application of MlWE74 is expected to greatly improve disease resistance in wheat varieties, contributing to global food security.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".