Analysis of Commitment to the Implementation of Sustainable Public Procurement in Brazil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable public procurement is a significant public policy towards sustainable development. In this context, this study investigated the public agents’ commitment to the procurement process within Brazilian public institutions regarding the implementation of sustainable public procurement and their perceptions of organizational and political commitment to the issue. A nationwide quantitative survey was conducted with 201 participants in the planning, selection, or execution phases of public procurement. The findings reveal that individual commitment to sustainable public procurement is moderate, while organizational and political commitment is low or nonexistent. Increased knowledge among public agents and the availability of organizational resources are identified as key factors that could enhance commitment to sustainable public procurement. The results have significant social implications, promoting more sustainable practices in the public sector and supporting responsible development aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This article is original in addressing sustainable public procurement from the public policy implementation perspective and the individuals’ viewpoint regarding individual, organizational, and political commitment to the issue, providing a deeper understanding of the variables that interfere with the implementation of this policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it