MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410455596 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105020

448P Real-world data: Hepatitis B prophylaxis in breast cancer patients, cancer centre experience

2025· article· en· W4410455596 on OpenAlexaff
Krishnie Srikandarajah, Nicholas F. Brown, D. Wong, Anne M. Fitzpatrick, J. Mansi

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerCancerInternal medicineOncologyHepatitis BFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatitis B reactivation (HBV) can occur during cancer therapy. Reactivation can range from a mild transaminitis to serious acute liver failure. Guidelines for haematological malignancies recommend baseline hepatitis B screening in patients potentially commencing immunosuppressive therapy for past and active HBV infection. However the current ESMO breast cancer guidelines do not incorporate this. Entecavir is a guanosine nucleoside analogue and can be used in hepatitis B prophylaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207