Strain-based modeling of burst pressure in pipelines with selective seam weld corrosion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A data-driven modeling process has been developed in this study to estimate the burst pressure of pipelines with surface wedge-shaped defects caused by selective seam weld corrosion (SSWC). The modeling of the pipeline burst pressure with SSWC was formulated through finite element analysis (FEA) conducted for different pipe attributes. Parametric studies for each pipe attribute were framed using the Buckingham π theorem, with burst pressure estimates derived by applying the Limiting Triaxial Strain criterion to the FEA stress and strain results. The model predictions were compared to failure pressure estimation results from standard methods used in the industry. A key finding from this research is the critical importance of incorporating the defect vertex radius into the data-driven burst pressure models. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess how inaccuracies in vertex radius estimation affect predicted burst pressure, and a parametric method has been proposed to estimate the vertex radius using measurable defect parameters. Full-scale hydrostatic burst pressure tests were conducted and compared to the FEA predictions to validate the accuracy of the 3D FEA models and the limiting triaxial strain criterion of pipe failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it