MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410457242 · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.70950

Voice Activated Human Following Robot Using Computer Vision

2025· article· en· W4410457242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVoice command deviceRobotHuman–computer interactionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionCommunicationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development of a voice-activated human-following robot that integrates computer vision and sensor-based obstacle avoidance to enable autonomous navigation in dynamic environments. The system employs a Raspberry Pi 4 as the primary processing unit and a Pi Camera to perform real-time human detection using a lightweight YOLOv5 model. Voice commands are captured through a microphone and processed using speech recognition to activate or control the robot. Ultrasonic sensors are used to detect and avoid obstacles, enhancing safety and reliability. The robot successfully combines vision, voice, and proximity sensing into a low-cost, flexible platform suitable for applications such as personal assistance, industrial tool handling, and smart surveillance. Experimental results demonstrate effective human tracking, responsive voice control, and reliable navigation in indoor settings

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it