MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410463730 · doi:10.1038/s44334-025-00033-0

Data-driven phase-field modeling for additively manufactured Inconel 617: Transformative insights for small modular reactors

2025· article· en· W4410463730 on OpenAlexafffund
Benhour Amirian, Mostafa Yakout, James D. Hogan

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Advanced Manufacturing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsTransformative learningInconelModular designField (mathematics)Phase (matter)Materials scienceNuclear engineeringComputer scienceMetallurgyEngineeringChemistryMathematicsPsychologyAlloyOperating systemPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the microstructural evolution and thermal-fluid behavior of Inconel 617 during laser-directed energy deposition additive manufacturing, focusing on temperature distribution, surface tension, and melt pool dynamics. A monolithic phase-field model, integrated with CALPHAD-informed thermodynamic data, is developed to predict solidification processes and surface tension variations. Results indicate that laser power critically influences thermal gradients, melt pool stability, and defect formation. Higher laser power increases thermal gradients, reducing surface tension and expanding melt pools, while lower laser power results in more stable surface tension and reduced defect risks. The temperature field is analyzed along and perpendicular to the laser movement, highlighting vaporization thresholds and melt pool geometry in governing material behavior. Surface tension consistently decreases near the laser interaction region, influenced by local thermal gradients. These findings contribute to process optimization—ensuring defect-free, corrosion-resistant Inconel 617 components with optimized microstructure and minimal residual stress for high-temperature applications, including small modular reactors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Advanced ManufacturingSame topicSolidification and crystal growth phenomenaFrench-language works237,207