Case - Hematuria with clot retention after clonidine/arginine growth hormone stimulation test
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arginine and clonidine Time Testing has been utilized to stimulate growth hormone (GH) in the pediatric population.This challenge test has been associated with transitory, self-limited, gross painless hematuria.We report a pre-pubertal child who underwent a GH stimulation test that led to painful hematuria with clot retention.The patient was managed expectantly as an outpatient, with subsequent resolution of all clots in the bladder on repeat US.GH stimulation test with arginine and clonidine has the potential to cause significant hematuria with clot retention that might entail intervention and has not previously been reported in the literature. KEY MESSAGES• Arginine and clonidine stimulation testing has the potential to cause significant gross hematuria with clot retention in pediatric patients.• This can manifest as increasing abdominal pain, urinary frequency with small volumes, blood clots, and burning with urination after GH stimulation test • Treatment can include Foley catheter, suprapubic tube, or expectant management depending on patient anatomy, preference, and extent of clotting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".