Interwoven Histories Along Water Roads and Liquid Borders: The Guadiana and Uruguay/La Plata Rivers as Case-Studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper provides an insight into the study of Portuguese-Spanish and Brazilian-Uruguayan-Argentinian borders, namely those administrative territories separated by respectively, the Guadiana and Uruguay/ La Plata Rivers from the perspective of Global History and Cultural Heritage studies. Borders are examined as geographic areas where connections and hybridisations occur and where shared territories are used to construct interwoven histories. This research is also focused on the way Iberian bordering processes became global in the Modern Era. Temporal and spatial scales are also considered in order to provide different interpretations of Iberian borderlands by proposing a periphery-based analysis of bordering processes, their cultural and social consequences, and the way all of these phaenomena can be reflected on tangible and intangible heritage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it