SyntheMol-RL: a flexible reinforcement learning framework for designing novel and synthesizable antibiotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rise of antibiotic-resistant pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus has created an urgent need for new antibiotics. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in drug discovery, but existing models often fail to propose compounds that are both effective and synthetically tractable. To address these challenges, we introduce SyntheMol-RL, a reinforcement learning-based generative model that can rapidly design synthetically accessible small molecule drug candidates from a massive chemical space of 46 billion compounds. SyntheMol-RL improves upon our prior Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)-based SyntheMol model by generalizing across chemically similar building blocks and enabling multi-parameter optimization. We applied SyntheMol-RL to generate candidate antibiotics against S. aureus by optimizing for both antibacterial activity and aqueous solubility, and we found that SyntheMol-RL generated molecules with improved predicted properties compared to both the previous MCTS version of SyntheMol as well as an AI-based virtual screening baseline. We synthesized 79 SyntheMol-RL compounds that were unique relative to the training dataset and found that 13 showed potent in vitro activity, of which seven were structurally novel after detailed literature searches. Furthermore, one hit compound, synthecin, demonstrated efficacy in a murine wound infection model of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). These results validate SyntheMol-RL’s ability to generate novel and synthetically accessible candidate antibiotics and position SyntheMol-RL as a powerful tool for drug design across therapeutic domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".