Impacts of Integral Yoga on Emotional Regulation and Aggression Indicators Among Youth in the Juvenile Justice System in Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Youth involved in the juvenile justice system in Colombia may face complex and intersecting trauma(s) that can affect key aspects of their well-being, including the regulation of difficult emotions such as anger or aggressive behaviors. The broader literature demonstrates that these well-being indicators may be crucial aspects of rehabilitation for youth in the Colombian juvenile justice system. Moreover, these indicators may be linked to the successful reintegration of youth into their communities and contribute to reduced recidivism rates. Presently in Colombia, few interventions for youth in juvenile detention centers seek to improve the emotional regulation or aggression levels of youth. The present study assesses the impact of a trauma-informed Integral Yoga intervention that focused on emotional regulation and aggression indicators in youth living in four juvenile detention centers located in three cities in Colombia (two in Cali, one in Bucaramanga, and one in Tunja). A pre/post quasi-experimental design was used in the evaluation, and the results demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in emotional regulation and a statistically significant reduction in aggression scores. The final discussion explores the role of trauma-informed and yoga-based interventions for youth rehabilitation in Colombia's juvenile justice system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".