Correlated Lattice Fluctuations in CsPbBr<sub>3</sub> Quantum Dots Give Rise to Long-Lived Electronic Coherence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electronic coherence is central to numerous areas of science, from quantum biology to quantum materials. In quantum materials, lead-halide perovskite (LHP) quantum dots (QDs) have been shown to support electronic coherence through observation of coherent single-photon emission and superfluorescence arising from spatial coherence at low temperatures. In contrast, direct measurement of temporal coherence between exciton states has been lacking. Here, we employ coherent multi-dimensional spectroscopy to observe an electronic coherence between exciton states in CsPbBr 3 QDs that is long-lived at room temperature, surviving nearly three times longer than the electronic dephasing time. This observation of a long-lived electronic coherence at room temperature points to nearly perfectly correlated lattice fluctuations for each excitonic state in the superposition. These experiments reveal that the properties of LHP QDs extend to lattice dynamics that give rise to correlated fluctuations in the basis exciton states, a process that may next be optimized by design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".