The Relationship Between Perceptions of Social Service Quality and Subjective Well‐Being
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT How people perceive the quality of social services and how that influences their subjective well‐being, or vice versa, is a topic that has received little attention in the literature. We explored these questions using a multilevel data analysis from the 2016 European Quality of Life Survey. We also used diffusion maps to get new insights arising from the data. While the correlations were statistically significant in both directions, the influence of perceptions of social service quality on subjective well‐being seemed more prominent. Furthermore, types of service (especially childcare and education) and welfare regimes significantly impacted the relationship between perceptions of social service quality and subjective well‐being. People with lower subjective well‐being had more homogenous perceptions of the quality of social services than those with higher subjective well‐being. Our study makes empirical and theoretical contributions to the social policy literature. The findings also have practical implications for policymakers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it