Machine Learning-Based Alfalfa Height Estimation Using Sentinel-2 Multispectral Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change is threatening the sustainability of crop yields due to an increasing frequency of extreme weather conditions, requiring timely agricultural monitoring. Remote sensing facilitates consistent and continuous monitoring of field crops. This study aimed to estimate alfalfa crop height through satellite images and machine learning methods within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) Python API. Ground measurements for this study were collected over three years in four Canadian provinces. We utilized Sentinel-2 data to obtain satellite imagery corresponding to the same timeframe and location as the ground measurements. Three machine learning algorithms were employed to estimate plant height from satellite images: random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). The efficacy of these algorithms has been assessed and compared. Several widely used vegetation indices, for instance normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), and normalized difference red-edge (NDRE), were selected and assessed in this study. RF feature importance was utilized to determine the ranking of features from most to least significant. Several feature selection strategies were utilized and compared with the situation where all features are used. We demonstrated that RF and XGB surpassed SVR when assessing test data performance. Our findings showed that XGB and RF could predict alfalfa crop height with an R2 of 0.79 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of around 4 cm Our findings indicated that SVR exhibited the lowest accuracy among the three algorithms tested, with R2 of 0.69 and an MAE of 4.63 cm. The analysis of important features showed that normalized difference red edge (NDRE) and normalized difference water index (NDWI) were the most important variables in determining alfalfa crop height. The results of this study also demonstrated that using RF and feature selection strategies, alfalfa crop height can be estimated with comparably high accuracy. Given that the models were fully trained and developed in Python (v. 3.10), they can be readily implemented in a decision support system and deliver near real-time estimations of alfalfa crop height for farmers throughout Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".