MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410481750 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.0096

0096 Changes in Network Criticality and Directed Functional Connectivity as Sleep Progresses: Insights into the Restorative Functions of Sleep

2025· article· en· W4410481750 on OpenAlexaff
Maya de Sulzer Wart, Hanieh Bazregarzadeh, Martín Antonio, Hélène Blais, Charles Gervais, Rosalie Girard Pepin, Julie Carrier, Jean‐Marc Lina, Nadia Gosselin, Catherine Duclos

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsWakefulnessElectroencephalographyPolysomnographyPsychologySleep (system call)Analysis of varianceCriticalityAudiologyMedicineNeuroscienceInternal medicinePhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Sleep plays a crucial role in restoring the brain’s functions and preparing it for the cognitive demands of the next day. However, little is known about how the brain’s functional dynamics support these functions. This study aims to investigate how network criticality and directed functional connectivity changes as sleep progresses across the night. Methods We recorded overnight polysomnography using 256-channel electroencephalography (EEG) in 16 adults (50.2±19.1 years, 6 females). We extracted the first and last episodes of each sleep stage (N=86), as well as wakefulness before and after the sleep episode (N=32), with a minimal duration of 3.5 minutes. To assess criticality, we calculated chaoticity, proximity to edge-of-chaos criticality (PECC), the pair correlation function (PCF), and Lempel-Ziv complexity (LZC). Additionally, the directed phase lag index (dPLI) was used to calculate the feedback dominance index (FDI) in the alpha frequency band (8-13 Hz). Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs, with post-hoc tests using Tukey’s correction, were used to compare sleep-wake stages and timing (first vs. last episode). Results Across all sleep and wakefulness stages, PCF showed higher values in the later episodes than in the earlier ones (p< 0.001). LZC showed similar results, with later episodes having higher complexity than earlier ones across all states (p< 0.01). Finally, FDI was higher towards the end of the night compared to the beginning across all states (p< 0.05), but only for the left hemisphere. Chaoticity and PECC showed no significant changes between first and last episodes. Conclusion These findings suggest that sleep may lead to a gradual restoration of criticality, complexity and feedback-dominant connectivity as the night progresses. The increase of PCF suggests that the brain’s activity moves closer to a critical point, and the higher LZC indicates more complexity in later episodes, both pointing to more optimal information processing, adaptability, and computational efficiency. Finally, the increase of FDI suggests that sleep restores anterior-to-posterior information flow as the night advances, potentially supporting the reintegration of distributed neural networks necessary for cognitive functioning and consciousness upon awakening. Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207