MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410481770 · doi:10.3390/opt6020021

Photoelastic Refractive Index Changes in GaAs Investigated by Finite Element Method (FEM) Simulations

2025· article· en· W4410481770 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodRefractive indexMaterials scienceIndex (typography)Structural engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringOptoelectronicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in the refractive indices of a GaAs laser chip owing to bonding strain are investigated by two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) finite element method (FEM) simulations. The strain induced by die attach (i.e., the bonding strain) was estimated by fitting simulations to the measured degree of polarisation (DOP) of photoluminescence from the facet of the bonded chip. Changes in the refractive indices were estimated using the strains obtained from fits to DOP data. Differences between the 2D and 3D FEM estimations of the deformation and of the photo-elastic effect are noted. It is recommended that 2D FEM simulations be used as starting points for 3D FEM simulations. Elastic constants for GaAs in plane-of-the-facet coordinate systems for 2D (plane stress and plane strain) and 3D FEM simulations are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it