MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410481826 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.0771

0771 A Buccal Mucosal Reflectance Oximeter Accurately Measures Arterial Oxyhemoglobin Saturation and Pulse Rate

2025· article· en· W4410481826 on OpenAlexaff
John E. Remmers, Connor Snow, Matiram Pun, Shane Magnison-Benoit, Thomas R. Tripp, Leo Transfiguracion, Giovanni Di Simone, Ming-Lai Lai, Jean M. Rawling, Steven Roy, Saleema Adatia, Erin Mosca, Marc J. Poulin

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuccal administrationReflectivityPulse (music)MedicinePulse oximetryPhotoplethysmogramPulse rateMaterials scienceOpticsInternal medicineDentistryAnesthesiaBlood pressureComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Pulse oximeter (SpO2) devices suitable for multi-night monitoring of arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO2) are not readily available despite a need to monitor SaO2 decreases in patients with sleep apnea and pulmonary diseases during sleep. The objective of the current study was to assess the SpO2 and pulse rate accuracy of a buccal mucosal oximeter embedded into a custom-fitted overlay of the upper teeth by comparison to a gold standard (CO-oximeter SaO2 and ECG heart rate). Methods Accuracy of the buccal mucosal oximeter was assessed in healthy participants (n=12) under non-motion conditions. Participants were made progressively hypoxic by decreasing the fraction of inspired oxygen in a stepwise manner to achieve a range of SaO2 from approximately 97-70%. SpO2 and pulse rate values from the buccal mucosal oximeter were compared with CO-oximeter values of SaO2 and ECG heart rate, respectively. Results SaO2 values were evenly distributed over the range of 97-67%. Analysis of 325 CO-oximeter SaO2/buccal mucosal oximeter SpO2 data pairs yielded the following: r = 0.95; bias = 0.72; and accuracy root-mean-square (ARMS) = 2.94%. Analysis of 346 ECG heart rate/buccal mucosal oximeter pulse rate data pairs yielded the following: r = 0.99, bias = 0.30; and ARMS = 2.08%. Conclusion The results of the study indicate that the buccal mucosal oximeter accurately measures SpO2 and pulse rate, as shown by good agreement with a gold standard, over a wide range of arterial hypoxemia. Such clinically acceptable accuracy indicates that this novel reflectance oximeter may prove useful in management of patients with sleep-induced hypoxemia by providing multi-night monitoring of SaO2. Additionally, the intraoral placement of the oximeter may be particularly convenient due to its temperature regulation, protection from ambient light, and relative lack of mucosal melanin. Support (if any) This study was funded by ProSomnus Sleep Technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207