Neuronal growth patterns and synapse formation are mediated by distinct activity-dependent mechanisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract All brain functions in animals rely upon neuronal connectivity that is established during early development. Although the activity-dependent mechanisms are deemed important for brain development and adult synaptic plasticity, the precise cellular and molecular mechanisms remain however, largely unknown. This lack of fundamental knowledge regarding developmental neuronal assembly owes its existence to the complexity of the mammalian brain as cell-cell interactions between individual neurons cannot be investigated directly. Here, we used individually identified synaptic partners from Lymnaea stagnalis to interrogate the role of neuronal activity patterns over an extended time period during various growth time points and synaptogenesis. Using intracellular recordings, microelectrode arrays, and time-lapse imaging, we identified unique patterns of activity throughout neurite outgrowth and synapse formation. Perturbation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels compromised neuronal growth patterns which also invoked a protein kinase A mediated pathway. Our findings underscore the importance of unique activity patterns in regulating neuronal growth, neurite branching, and synapse formation, and identify the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".