MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410482547 · doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2495642

Brief intensive EMDR therapy for PTSD in adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and behavioural problems: a multiple baseline design study

2025· article· en· W4410482547 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Versluis, Ad de Jongh, Liesbeth Mevissen, Carlo Schuengel, Lianne Bakkum, Robert Didden

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersZonMw's Heeren Loo
KeywordsBaseline (sea)Intellectual disabilityPsychologyBorderline intellectual functioningClinical psychologyPsychiatryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Individuals with mild intellectual disability (MID; IQ 50–70) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF; IQ 70–85) are at an elevated risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), with PTSD symptoms possibly associated with behavioural problems. It is important to test the effectiveness of trauma-focused treatments, such as eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy, for adults with MID–BIF, PTSD, and severe behavioural problems.Objective: To determine the safety and effectiveness of brief intensive EMDR therapy carried out by a team of rotating therapists in adults with MID-BIF, PTSD, and severe behavioural problems.Methods: Using a randomised non-concurrent multiple baseline between-subjects design, 11 adults with MID-BIF, PTSD, and severe behavioural problems received a maximum of 16 intensive EMDR sessions twice daily for a maximum of two weeks from six different EMDR therapists. Primary outcome measurements included severity of PTSD symptoms, PTSD diagnostic status, and adverse events. Secondary outcome measurements included the frequency and severity of behavioural problems, presence of adaptive behaviour, and the use of involuntary care. Outcome measurements were assessed at baseline, during the intervention and post-intervention phases, and at the follow-up phases, and subject to randomisation tests for statistical significance.Results: Intensive EMDR therapy carried out by a team of rotating therapists resulted in significant decreases in PTSD symptoms (Mdifference = 15.84, p < .001) with nine of 11 participants no longer meeting the PTSD diagnostic criteria immediately following treatment and at the 9-week follow-up. Randomisation tests revealed no significant changes in adaptive behaviour, frequency, and severity of behavioural problems. Additionally, no decrease in the use of involuntary care measures was observed. One participant dropped out; no adverse events were observed.Conclusions: Brief intensive EMDR therapy for individuals with MID-BIF and severe behavioural problems, conducted by a team of rotating therapists, can be done safely and effectively to reduce PTSD symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean journal of psychotraumatologySame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207