MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration and Neonatal Outcomes

2025· article· en· W4410484017 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nir Melamed, Kellie E. Murphy, Christy Pylypjuk, Rebecca Sherlock, Guillaume Éthier, Eugene W. Yoon, Prakesh S. Shah, Carlos Fajardo, Jonathan Wong, Andrzej Kajetanowicz, Christine Drolet, Valérie Bertelle, Édith Massé, Anie Lapointe, Keith J. Barrington, Brigitte Lemyre, Hala Makary, Aziz Ahmad, Ayman Abou Mehrem, Amit Mukerji, Mary Seshia, Deepak Louis, Kyong‐Soon Lee, Jehier Afifi, Jo-Anna Hudson, Victoria Bizgu, Nina Nouraeyen, Faiza Khurshid, Kevin Coughlin, Marie St‐Hilaire, Marc Beltempo, Marco Zeid, Andrei Harabor, Jennifer Toye, Joseph Ting, Miroslav Stavel, Lannae Strueby, Gabriela de Carvalho Nunes, Wissam Alburaki, Ann Yi, Chelsea Ruth, Paloma Costa, Thevanisha Pillay, Sajit Augustine

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Network Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineSurrey Memorial HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaMount Sinai HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity of ManitobaSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineGestational agePediatricsRetrospective cohort studyPregnancyRelative riskGestationCohort studySmall for gestational ageConfidence intervalObstetricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are accepted to be most effective in reducing prematurity-related neonatal mortality and morbidity when administered 1 to 7 days before birth. However, precise data on the optimal timing of administration are scarce. Objective: To investigate the association between ACS administration to birth interval as a continuous variable and neonatal outcomes among preterm neonates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2018 to 2021 at level III neonatal intensive care units participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network. Participants included singleton and twin neonates born from 23 weeks 0 days' to 31 weeks 6 days' gestation. Data were analyzed from November 29, 2023, to March 8, 2024. Exposure: ACS administration to birth interval. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was neonatal mortality. The secondary outcome was a composite of mortality or severe neurologic injury. Associations of the ACS administration to birth interval with the study outcomes were modeled using restricted cubic splines with 5 knots. Results: A total of 7950 neonates met the study criteria, from 7124 pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 31.1 [5.7] years). Compared with individuals who received ACS, those who did not were younger and had lower rates of nulliparity, twin pregnancy, hypertension, and gestational diabetes. The overall rates of neonatal mortality and the composite outcome were 8% (670 of 7950) and 14% (1132 of 7950), respectively. ACS exposure was associated with reduced neonatal mortality as early as 2 hours after administration (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.70-1.00]). The reduction in mortality risk increased to a plateau 12 hours following exposure (ARR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.40-0.78]), remained stable for the first 2 weeks following exposure, and gradually decreased after that. The association with reduced mortality was no longer observed at 4 weeks after administration (ARR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.56-1.20]), and the ARR approached the null 5 weeks after administration (ARR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.56-1.73]). This pattern was not affected by gestational age at birth or the number of fetuses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort of neonates born from 23 weeks 0 days' gestation to 31 weeks 6 days' gestation, ACS administration was associated with a reduction in neonatal mortality as early as 2 hours after the administration of the first dose. The interval associated with the greatest reduction in neonatal mortality was between 12 hours and 14 days before birth, which was wider than the currently accepted optimal interval of 1 to 7 days. These findings may have important clinical implications for the management of pregnancies at risk of preterm birth, particularly regarding the administration of ACS even in cases in which preterm birth is imminent, and the timing of repeat courses of ACS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Network OpenSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207