MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410484928 · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59871-3

Wnt/β-catenin activation by mutually exclusive FBXW11 and CTNNB1 hotspot mutations drives salivary basal cell adenoma

2025· article· en· W4410484928 on OpenAlexaff
Kim Wong, Justin A. Bishop, Ilan Weinreb, Marialetizia Motta, Martin Del Castillo Velasco‐Herrera, Emanuele Bellacchio, Ingrid Ferreira, Louise van der Weyden, Jacqueline Marcia Boccacino, Antonella Lauri, Giovannina Rotundo, Andrea Ciolfi, Saamin Cheema, Rebeca Olvera-León, Victoria Offord, Alastair Droop, Ian Vermes, Michael Allgäeuer, Martin Hyrcza, Elizabeth Anderson, Nicolas de Saint Aubain, Carolin Mogler, Albrecht Stenzinger, Mark J. Arends, Thomas Brenn, Marco Tartaglia, David J. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersMedical Research CouncilAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul CancroMinistero della SaluteWellcome TrustWellcome
KeywordsWnt signaling pathwayHRASCateninBiologyCancer researchMissense mutationPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayMutationBeta-cateninMutantSalivary glandGeneticsGeneSignal transductionKRAS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basal cell adenoma (BCA) and basal cell adenocarcinoma (BCAC) of the salivary gland are rare tumours that can be difficult to distinguish from each other and other salivary gland tumour subtypes. Using next-generation sequencing, we identify a recurrent FBXW11 missense mutation (p.F517S) in BCA that is mutually exclusive with the previously reported CTNNB1 p.I35T gain-of-function (GoF) mutation with these mutations collectively accounting for 94% of BCAs. In vitro, mutant FBXW11 is characterised by defective binding to β-catenin and higher protein levels within the nucleus. This is consistent with the increased nuclear expression of β-catenin and activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. The genomic profiles of BCAC are distinct from BCA, with hotspot DICER1 and HRAS mutations and putative driver mutations affecting PI3K/AKT and NF-κB signalling pathway genes. These findings have important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of BCA and BCAC, which, despite histopathologic overlap, may be unrelated entities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207