Devoirs et intendance sur l’eau : comment les Premières Nations de la côte ouest du Canada nous amènent-elles à repenser les rapports aux espaces halieutiques ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sur la côte ouest du Canada, dans un contexte marqué par un effacement historique des normativités autochtones, des visions alternatives sont aujourd’hui proposées par les peuples autochtones pour repenser nos rapports aux espaces aquatiques, et particulièrement halieutiques. Ce faisant, ils appellent à ce que leurs rôles d’intendants (stewards) ou de gardiens puissent être pleinement exercés sur ces espaces. À partir d’exemples puisés chez les peuples Kwakwaka’wakw et Nuu-chah-nulth de l’île de Vancouver, cet article montre comment les peuples autochtones d’aujourd’hui prennent acte des résultats d’une histoire particulière afin de proposer des alternatives à la fois innovatrices et en continuité avec les grandes logiques relationnelles qui caractérisent leurs rapports au territoire et à l’eau depuis, on le présume, des temps immémoriaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".