Pluralisme juridique et patrimoines autochtones. Négociation d’un régime de droit relationnel dans le cadre du rapatriement des collections muséales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article interroge les cadres légaux canadiens et internationaux en matière de rapatriement d’objets et de revendications territoriales autochtones, tous organisés autour de la dimension collective des droits, une dimension qui structure les demandes de rapatriement et les processus de revendication territoriale, au détriment de pratiques normatives locales plus complexes. Il questionne l’état du droit par l’entremise de données produites dans le cadre d’un projet de recherche qui a permis de mettre en lumière la relation entretenue par une famille, membre de la communauté ilnu de Mashteuiatsh (Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada), avec un objet : un teuehikan (tambour). Ce cas sous-tend un rapport à l’objet et un régime normatif de propriété ilnu relationnel, un rapport effacé par le régime actuel de propriété collective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".