MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410493539 · doi:10.1007/s44347-025-00021-9

Development of a co-axial tri-extruder for low-melting point metals and UV-curable resins

2025· article· en· W4410493539 on OpenAlexafffund
Rawan Elsersawy, Mohammad Abu Hasan Khondoker

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Polymers. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of ReginaUniversity of Regina
KeywordsPlastics extrusionMelting pointMaterials scienceComposite materialPoint (geometry)Chemical engineeringMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for flexible and stretchable electronics has recently gained high focus. Many fields, such as medicine, textiles, and aerospace, require conductive elements that can be mounted or sewed to the part. This means that this conductive element must have high flexibility and resistance to deformation. This research presents a novel fabrication technique of flexible electronics using coaxial extrusion methods for applications such as wearables, biosensors, and soft robotics. Another aspect of the study is the combination of eutectic gallium-indium, Acrylated Aliphatic Urethane Elastomer Resin, and Field's metal to develop flexible and multi-functional electronic devices. This work used comprehensive material properties, such as their flowability, UV curability, and flexibility, and interactions to analyze the rheological behaviors of these materials under different extrusion conditions. These materials were precisely and simultaneously deposited onto flexible substrates using a custom-designed coaxial extrusion system, while using G-code for controlling the extrusion parameters. The findings verify the feasibility of this approach in the fabrication of functional flexible conductive wires. This coaxial extrusion process has proven to be a promising technique owing to its versatility and scalability for rapid prototyping and large-scale production, hence offering enormous advancement in flexible electronics. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44347-025-00021-9.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover Polymers.→Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials→French-language works237,207→