Effect of Pectoralis Minor Length on Scapular Endurance and Core Endurance in Young Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pectoralis minor (PM) are muscle groups that play a role in stabilizing the scapula.The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of PM muscle length on scapular and core muscle endurance in the dominant and non-dominant limb.A total of 93 women were included in the study.Demographic data were recorded.PM length was measured with a caliper.Scapular muscle endurance was evaluated using the scapular isometric compression test and core endurance using McGill's torso-muscular endurance test battery.Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that dominant pectoralis minor length and pectoralis minor index and non-dominant pectoralis minor length and pectoralis minor index can affect trunk flexion and trunk extension.The longest muscle endurance time was found in the scapular test (46.32),followed by the core tests performed in extension (30.37 s), flexion (26.17 s), dominant side bridge position (10.06 s), non-dominant side bridge position (9.36 s).PM length had no effect on scapular and core muscle endurance measured in the side bridge position.In the trunk flexion and extension positions was directly related to the dominant and non-dominant PM muscle length.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".