Enhancing dipole polarization loss in conjugated metal-organic frameworks via coordination symmetry breaking under electromagnetic field
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modulating the dipole polarization loss in the single-atom region and establishing its direct relationship with the EWA performance remain an unmet challenge. Here, a dual-ligand modulation strategy, i.e., partially changing coordination atoms in the single-metal region (sMr), is introduced to effectively break the coordination symmetry of conjugated metal-organic frameworks (cMOFs), finally enhancing EWA property of cMOFs materials. Further, the asymmetrical sMr is experimentally found to elicit the dipole polarization loss, overcoming the handicaps of other electromagnetic wave loss mechanisms, which directly contribution to enhance EWA performance of this series of cMOFs. This strategy is further confirmed by replacing metal centers. Among studied series of cMOFs, Cu 2.25 /Co 0.75 (HHTP 1.67 HITP 0.33 ) achieves excellent EWA performance with an effective absorption bandwidth of 5.00 GHz and a reflection loss of −66.03 dB. We introduce a dual-ligand modulation strategy targeting single-metal regions within cMOFs here, aiming to achieve superior EWA performance through atomic-scale dipole polarization loss modulation. We hope our study can inspire more exploration to realize high-performance EWA materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it