MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410494555 · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.05.002

Describing the Experiences of Health-care Providers Who Supported an Outreach Program to Deliver Point-of-care Screening in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Experiencing Homelessness in Calgary, Canada: A Qualitative Analysis

2025· article· en· W4410494555 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Hannah Yaphe, Sara Scott, Huanghe Ding, Breanna McSweeney, Eshleen Grewal, David J.T. Campbell, Breanna McSweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Diabetes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersLibin Cardiovascular Institute, University of CalgaryCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgarySiemens CanadaSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsMedicineOutreachType 2 diabetesHealth carePoint of carePoint (geometry)Family medicineNursingGerontologyDiabetes mellitusEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0220.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Diabetes→Same topicHomelessness and Social Issues→French-language works237,207→