MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410498476 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00132-25

Performance of the bioLytical Multiplex HIV 1/2 and Syphilis rapid test on serum in a laboratory evaluation for syphilis

2025· article· en· W4410498476 on OpenAlexaff
Anastasia Eliopoulos, Emily McCullough, Ameeta E. Singh, Jennifer Gratrix, Graham Tipples, Hong Zhou, Rick Galli, Sean B. Rourke, Kevin Fonseca

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of CalgarySt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyphilisRapid plasma reaginMedicineCongenital syphilisTiterSerologyMultiplexImmunologyOutbreakSyphilis SerodiagnosisObstetricsInternal medicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)TreponemaVirologyBiologyAntibodyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Syphilis, a sexually transmitted infection, is resurging with large outbreaks worldwide. In pregnant females, vertical transmission can result in stillbirths and serious sequelae for the fetus. Syphilis serology is primarily used to make the diagnosis, but the testing platforms and confirmatory tests are often centralized; therefore, the time to a result is usually more than 2 days. Most affected populations in the current outbreaks can be transient and easily lost to follow up. Therefore, rapid testing can assist with timely detection, treatment, and linkage to care. We evaluated the performance of the INSTI Multiplex HIV-1/2 Syphilis rapid test, using a large panel of negative and confirmed positive sera with varying rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers. Sera with RPR titers of 1:8 and greater consistently gave a positive rapid test result (93.8%-100%; 95% CI: 82.5%-100%), whereas samples with RPR titers of 1:2 and lower were often negative (7.6%-56.5%). Rapid test positive samples generally had a syphilis CMIA S/CO ratio of 19.78 and higher, although there was no specific ratio that separated all positive from negative rapid results. In infectious syphilis, RPR titers are often 1:8 and greater and should be reliably detected with this rapid test (accuracy 97.2%), thereby supporting immediate treatment and linkage to care with a high level of confidence. Additionally, a result is available within minutes and therefore could be included on acute care STAT laboratory test menus while the individual is an in-patient or awaiting assessment in the Emergency Department. IMPORTANCE: We examined the performance of the syphilis antibody component of a rapid multiplex device and found that sera with RPR titers of 1:8 and greater, often found in infectious syphilis, were highly likely to test positive. This device would be suitable for providing STAT syphilis serology testing for suspect cases waiting in the Emergency Department or as inpatients. Positive results can support immediate treatment and linkage to care, especially for pregnant females and transient persons who are often lost to follow up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicSyphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207