MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An International Business Policy Perspective of the European Union’s Cohesion Investments

2025· book-chapter· en· W4410499037 on OpenAlexaff
Ari Van Assche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohesion (chemistry)Perspective (graphical)European unionBusinessPolitical scienceInternational tradeArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A highlight of the 2023 EIBA Conference was the keynote address by Dr Elisa Ferreira, the European Commissioner for Cohesion and Reforms, which she delivered during the closing plenary. In this chapter, we utilize a framework that Valentina De Marchi and I developed in our inaugural editorial for the Journal of International Business Policy to assess how international business scholars can contribute to Dr Ferreira’s efforts in crafting an effective EU Cohesion Policy. We discuss advances and future research directions in the areas of: (1) the relationship between international business and regional disparities; (2) the impact of cohesion policies on international business; (3) the impact of international business on EU cohesion policy; and (4) the effectiveness of international business policy for cohesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207