MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410501044 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.1065

1065 Uncovering Ethnic/Racial Disparities in Pediatric Sleep Quality: Insights from the San Diego Sleep Survey

2025· article· en· W4410501044 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Megan Warner, Florence K.Y. Wu, Sarah Inkelis, Jeremy Landeo Gutierrez, Rakesh Bhattacharjee

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSleep (system call)Ethnic groupSleep qualityMedicineGerontologyPsychologyPsychiatryInsomniaSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Pediatric sleep questionnaires are essential tools for screening sleep disorders, especially where access to pediatric sleep specialists and laboratories is limited and often where underserved and minoritized populations receive care. Moreover, there is limited knowledge on the prevalence of sleep symptoms among representative race/ethnic pediatric groups in the U.S. To address this, we developed the San Diego Sleep Survey (SDSS) with the goal to assess a wide range of sleep symptoms within a clinical setting. This study aimed to identify potential differences in reported sleep symptoms between patient-reported ethnicities and racial groups. Methods Caregivers of patients referred to the Rady Children’s Hospital Sleep Center in San Diego, California, completed the SDSS via the Epic® Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system. The SDSS is a 51-item questionnaire utilizing a 4-point Likert scale (Never, Sometimes, Usually, Do Not Know) to provide detailed insights into sleep difficulties. Five domain scores are used to evaluate pediatric sleep issues: insomnia, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), parasomnias, sleep hygiene, and daytime symptoms (DS), with lower scores indicating better sleep health. The survey is available in both English and Spanish, and demographics were extracted from the EMR. Results 1,362 patients completed the SDSS and PSQ from 2011 to 2021. The mean age was 8.174.62 years, and 554 (40.7%) were female. The cohort included 647 (47.5%) Hispanic, 558 (41.0%) Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, 85 (6.2%) Non-Hispanic Asian (NHA), and 72 (5.3%) Non-Hispanic Black (NHB). SDB scores were significantly lower among NHW children compared to Hispanic and NHB children (p < 0.01). In contrast, DS scores were significantly higher for NHW patients compared to Hispanic and NHB children. No differences in insomnia scores were observed across ethnic groups. Finally, sleep hygiene scores were significantly lower (p < 0.05) among NHW children compared to other groups. Conclusion The application of the SDSS in a large pediatric sleep clinic population revealed significant differences in reported sleep symptoms across children of various race/ethnicities. Although the sample included a smaller number of NHB children, the findings highlight substantial variations in symptom reporting by race/ethnicity, underscoring the impact of healthcare disparities on pediatric sleep health outcomes. Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207