MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410501965 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.1216

1216 Autonomic Dysregulation During Sleep in Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder

2025· article· en· W4410501965 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Christophe Moderie, Philippe Boudreau, Rafael Pérez‐Medina‐Carballo, Diane B. Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPremenstrual dysphoric disorderPsychologyPsychiatryREM sleep behavior disorderMedicineClinical psychologyAudiologyPolysomnographyInternal medicineElectroencephalographyMenstrual cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) is a menstrual cycle-related mood disorder, frequently associated with insomnia during the luteal phase (LP). Mood disorders and sleep disturbances are independently associated with altered autonomic nervous system (ANS) function. Research suggests that the menstrual cycle modulates ANS during wakefulness, with decreased parasympathetic activity from the follicular to LP. We hypothesize disturbed ANS regulation during sleep in PMDD during the symptomatic LP. This study aimed to investigate whether menstrual cycle–related variation in ANS activity is accentuated in women with PMDD compared to controls, and how such differences might relate to anxiety and sleep quality. Methods Seven women (32.0 ± 5.7 years) with PMDD-related LP insomnia and five healthy controls (30.4 ± 8.2 years) underwent polysomnography every third night across one menstrual cycle (n=96 nights). Heart rate variability (HRV) measures, including high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF), LF/HF ratio, and rMSSD, were extracted from non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Menstrual phase and group effects were evaluated using mixed-model ANOVA. Morning questionnaires assessed anxiety (visual analogue scale) and sleep quality (7-point Likert scale), which were correlated with HRV parameters. Results Compared to controls, PMDD participants showed significantly reduced HF (F1,24=7.4 p= 0.008) and rMSSD (F1,24=16.4, p < 0.001), reflecting lower vagal tone, and elevated LF/HF ratios (F1,24=35.0, p < 0.001), an index of HRV reflecting sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve activity. No main effects of the menstrual phase or interaction effects were found. Anxiety was associated positively with LF/HF ratio (r=0.32, p=0.02) and negatively with rMSSD (r=-0.42, p=0.003). No significant association was found between HRV parameters and reported sleep quality. Conclusion These results suggest a stable, trait-like autonomic vulnerability in PMDD, independent of the menstrual phase, characterized by diminished parasympathetic activity. The lack of a menstrual phase effect may reflect differences from previous studies, which primarily assessed ANS during wakefulness, or could be due to our limited sample size. Furthermore, our findings suggest a potential relationship between autonomic dysregulation during sleep and elevated anxiety in PMDD, independent of changes in sleep quality. Support (if any) This study was supported the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, grant MOP-38064).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207