MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410502184 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.1075

1075 Factors Associated with the Use of Self-help Strategies for Sleep in Children and Adolescents with Epilepsy

2025· article· en· W4410502184 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Peï-Yu Wu, Shao‐Yu Tsai

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsEpilepsySleep (system call)PsychologyPsychiatryMedicinePediatricsDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Sleep problems are common in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Our previous analyses have shown that this population used a variety of self-help strategies to improve sleep. However, factors associated with the use of these self-help strategies have not been investigated. Exploring these factors is crucial for identifying the groups of children and adolescents most in need of intervention. This cross-sectional observational study aims to examine factors associated with the use of self-help strategies for sleep in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Methods A convenience sample of 251 children and adolescents with epilepsy aged 1-18 years and their parents or caregivers were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital in Northern Taiwan. Participants completed a socio-demographic form and 1-week diaries documenting their self-help strategies for sleep. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to explore factors associated with the use of self-help strategies for sleep in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Results The mean age of children and adolescents with epilepsy was 6.1 ± 4.47 years, and 56.2% were male. A total of 177 (70.5%) parents reported using self-help strategies to help their children’s sleep. The most commonly used self-help strategies were accompanying the child (46.6%) and relaxation techniques (25.1%). Multivariate analyses revealed that younger age (β = -.071, p <.01), having an employed mother (β = 0.371, p <.01), being an only child (β = 0.312, p <.01), and a higher frequency of seizures over the past 3 months (β =.284, p <.01) were significantly associated with greater strategy use. Conclusion This study shows that various demographic and clinical factors are associated with the use of self-help strategies for improving sleep in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Future studies should explore how these factors influence the choice and effectiveness of self-help strategies for sleep in this population. Support (if any) This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, MOST 104-2314-B-002-115-MY3 and NSTC 112-2628-B-002-003.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207