MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410502216 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.1256

1256 Prolonged Grief and Related Health Factors Modify the Relationship Between Bedroom Light Exposure and Sleep Fragmentation

2025· article· en· W4410502216 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Takuya Yoshiike, Tomohiro Utsumi, Tomoko Yajima, Kentaro NAGAO, Aoi Kawamura, Eriya Takahashi, Masahito Nangaku, Shingo Kitamura, Kentaro Matsui, Satomi Nakajima, Kenichi Kuriyama

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBedroomGriefSleep (system call)PsychologyFragmentation (computing)MedicineEnvironmental healthPsychiatryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Light information critically influences sleep and emotion regulation. Nighttime light exposure has been suggested to disrupt sleep and predict poor health outcomes. However, little is known about how sleep changes after bereavement and how sleep changes contribute to prolonged grief. We examined the association between nighttime light exposure and sleep continuity in bereaved adults. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 30 adults who had been bereaved for at least one year, wore a wrist actigraphy for seven consecutive nights. Bedroom light intensity from bedtime to rising time (BLI, lux) and sleep continuity variables were estimated from the wrist actigraphy. We tested the association between BLI and natural log-transformed sleep continuity measures and explored factors that modify this relationship in multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models. Results Nearly 40% of participants were diagnosed with current prolonged grief disorder (PGD), even after a median of 2.5 years since the loss. The mean BLI was 3.72 lux. Overall, higher BLI was associated with lower sleep continuity, independently of psychological, physical, and sleep covariates, including total sleep time, sleep midpoint, and season. This was particularly evident for sleep fragmentation index (B = 0.076; 95% CI, 0.029–0.122; exp[B] = 1.079), indicating that every 1-unit increase in BLI was associated with a 7.9% increase in sleep fragmentation index. Moreover, the association between BLI and sleep fragmentation was more robust in participants with current PGD, those who had lost a child or spouse, and those whose loss was violent or sudden than in those without each of these characteristics. Similarly, depressive symptoms, hypnotic use, and regular alcohol drinking also modified the relationship between BLI and sleep fragmentation. Conclusion These data strengthen the evidence for nighttime light exposure and sleep fragmentation. Our findings suggest that post-loss stress and vulnerability factors interact to disrupt sleep through increased light sensitivity at night. Further research is needed to determine the role of sleep fragmentation in the maintenance of and recovery from grief. Support (if any) This work was supported by the Intramural Research Grant for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP (Grant numbers #3-1 and #6-1) and KAKENHI (Grant numbers #20H01774 and #23H01045).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207