MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410502304 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.1255

1255 High Suicide Risk in Adolescents Without Sleep Disturbances Is Associated with Higher Daytime Sleepiness and Later Rise Time

2025· article· en· W4410502304 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Reut Gruber, Sujata Saha, Rosalie Barbeau, Gail Sommerville

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDaytimeExcessive daytime sleepinessSleep (system call)MedicinePsychiatryPsychologyAudiologyClinical psychologySleep disorderInsomnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Suicide is a leading cause of death among adolescents. Although sleep disturbances are well-documented risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, little research has examined the association between sleep and suicide risk among adolescents without sleep disorders, particularly in community samples. To fill this gap, the present study compared sleep and circadian parameters of adolescents without sleep disturbances who showed high and low levels of suicidality. Methods 188 adolescents (M= 14.32 years, SD = 1.88; 59 boys) scoring in the normal range on the Sleep Disorders Inventory– Adolescent Form were recruited from high schools in Quebec. They wore actigraphs at home for six consecutive nights, completed a sleep diary nightly, and completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ). Demographic information was obtained from their parents. Suicidality was assessed based on the participants’ response to the 9th item of the Beck Depression Inventory. If they responded “I do not have any thoughts of killing myself,” they were classified as having low suicide risk, whereas if they responded “I have thoughts of killing myself, but I would not carry them out” or “I would like to kill myself” or “I would kill myself if I had the chance,” they were classified as having high suicide risk. Results Thirty-three adolescents (17.6%; 27 girls, 6 boys) reported suicidal ideation whereas 155 (82.4%; 102 girls, 53 boys) reported no suicidal ideation. MANCOVAs revealed significantly higher daytime sleepiness and significantly later rise time in the group with high suicide risk compared to those with low risk. There were no significant group differences in sleep duration, quality, chronotype, or circadian preferences. Conclusion In this community sample of adolescents without sleep disturbances, adolescents at risk for suicide showed higher daytime sleepiness and later rise times during the school year. These findings highlight the importance of improved awareness of signs of daytime sleepiness among adolescents and point to the potential benefits of including sleep health promotion as an important component of interventions aimed at lowering youth suicide risk. Limitations. The cross-sectional design of this study limits determination of causality. Support (if any) Charles, Evelyn & Sandra Dolansky Foundation CIHR grant#365284

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207