MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410502399 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.0845

0845 Samelisant (SUVN-G3031) Alleviates Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Narcolepsy: Results from a Phase-2 Study

2025· article· en· W4410502399 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ramakrishna Nirogi, Vinod Goyal, Jyothsna Ravula, Pradeep Jayarajan, Satish Jetta, Anil Shinde, Vijay Benade, Ramkumar Subramanian

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarcolepsyDaytimeExcessive daytime sleepinessMedicineMultiple Sleep Latency TestPsychologyAudiologyModafinilSleep disorderPsychiatryInsomniaPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), uncontrollable sleep attacks, cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucinations, and sleep paralysis. Current treatments for narcolepsy often come with significant limitations, such as side effects, limited efficacy, or the necessity of combining multiple therapies. Samelisant is a selective inverse agonist of histamine 3 receptors, showing promising potential as a novel treatment for this condition. In preclinical studies involving orexin knockout mice, Samelisant demonstrated wake-promoting effects and reduced cataplexy, underscoring its therapeutic potential. Samelisant safety/tolerability has been established in healthy subjects. Methods Samelisant was evaluated as monotherapy in a Phase 2 proof-of-concept study conducted in the USA and Canada to treat EDS in patients with narcolepsy (NCT04072380). The study enrolled narcoleptic patients aged 18 to 65 years per ICSD-3 criteria, who had an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of ≥12 and a mean Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) time of < 12 minutes. A total of 190 patients were randomized into three treatment groups (placebo, Samelisant 2 mg, and Samelisant 4 mg) in a 1:1:1 ratio and received either placebo or Samelisant once daily for 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in ESS score from Baseline to Day 14. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included changes in Clinical Global Impression – Severity, MWT and Patient Global Impression – Change scores from Baseline to Day 14. Safety was monitored throughout the study by the medical monitor and the data safety monitoring committee. Results Study evaluating Samelisant achieved primary efficacy endpoint demonstrating statistically significant (p< 0.024) and clinically meaningful reduction (-2.1 point) in ESS total score compared to placebo. Treatment with Samelisant resulted in significant improvement in EDS on scales assessed by both clinicians and patients. Samelisant was generally safe and well tolerated in narcolepsy patients and there were no serious events or death reported. Conclusion Samelisant holds promise as a monotherapy for treatment of EDS in narcolepsy, and a global Phase 3 study for the treatment of narcolepsy will be initiated in Q2 2025 Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207