Evaluating Performance of Metal-Organic Complexes as Electrodes in Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With increasing energy demands, fuel cells are a popular avenue for portability and low waste emissions. Hydrogen fuel cells are popular due to their potential output power and clean waste. However, due to storage and transport concerns, hydrogen peroxide fuel cells are a promising alternative. Although they have a lower output potential compared to hydrogen fuel cells, peroxide can act as both the oxidizing and reducing agent, simplifying the structure of the cell. In addition to reducing the complexity, hydrogen peroxide is stable in liquid form and can be stored in less demanding methods. This paper investigates chelated metals as electrode material for hydrogen peroxide fuel cells. Chelated metal complexes are ring-like structures that form from binding organic or inorganic compounds with metal ions. They are used in medical imaging, water treatment, and as catalysts for reactions. Copper(II) phthalocyanine, phthalocyanine green, poly(copper phthalocyanine), bis(ethylenediamine)copper(II) hydroxide, iron(III) ferrocyanine, graphene oxide decorated with Fe3O4, zinc phthalocyanine, magnesium phthalocyanine, manganese(II) phthalocyanine, cobalt(II) phthalocyanine are investigated as electrode materials for peroxide fuel cells. In this study, the performance of these materials is evaluated using cyclic voltammetry. The voltammograms are compared, as well as observations are made during the materials’ use to measure their effectiveness as electrode material. There has been limited research comparing the use of these chelated metals in the context of hydrogen peroxide fuel cells. Through this research, the goal is to further the viability of hydrogen peroxide fuel cells. Poly(copper phthalocyanine) and graphene oxide doped with iron oxides had strong redox catalytic activity for use in acidic peroxide single-compartment fuel cells, where the poly(copper phthalocyanine) electrode compound generated the highest peak power density of 7.92 mW/cm2 and cell output potential of 0.634 V.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".