Amity Institute of Travel and Tourism Ntcc Minor Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research paper explores the dynamic evolution, drivers, impacts, and emerging trends within the adventure tourism industry from 2014 to 2024. Adventure tourism, defined by its emphasis on physical activity, nature interaction, and cultural immersion, has transitioned from a niche segment to a key driver in the global travel economy. The study highlights how consumer demand for meaningful and experiential travel—especially among Millennials and Gen Z—has catalyzed the sector’s rapid growth, projected to surpass $1 trillion by 2024. Key themes include the sector’s economic benefits for local communities, its role in promoting sustainability and conservation, and the risks associated with physically demanding activities. Using qualitative methodology, the study synthesizes secondary data, including literature reviews, industry reports, and case studies from destinations like Costa Rica, New Zealand, and Canada. Emerging trends such as eco-conscious travel, technological integration, wellnessadventure hybrids, and personalized experiences are discussed, revealing how they shape the future of the industry. The research concludes that adventure tourism holds immense potential for socio-economic development and environmental stewardship, provided stakeholders embrace innovation, sustainability, and responsible travel practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.155 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".