MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410512336 · doi:10.3138/cjgim.2024.0032

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A narrative review

2025· review· en· W4410512336 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alexandre Beaulac, Annabelle Cumyn, Anne-Marie Côté, Nadia Caron

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyNarrativeNarrative reviewObstetricsIntensive care medicineLiteratureGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reviews hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia. They can be categorized according to chronological and clinical features. The presence of feto-maternal complications is typical in preeclampsia but can also occur in chronic hypertension. Treatment to limit the rise of blood pressure is essential to prevent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular adverse outcomes, but magnesium sulphate remain the preventive treatment for eclampsia. Despite delivery being the only curative treatment, blood pressure can rise in the first week postpartum. Ongoing monitoring of blood pressure is thus required postpartum to prevent adverse maternal issues. Awareness of long term maternal cardiometabolic and cerebrovascular complications is key and detailed counseling should be done for prevention. Research is ongoing to better understand associations with HDP and long term complications, and how to mitigate such risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207