DOES ADDING CONCOMITANT IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY TO BELIMUMAB PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BENEFITS IN SLE? ANALYSIS FROM BEL-SPAIN: THE SPANISH BELIMUMAB MULTICENTER REGISTRY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PV257 / #666 Poster Topic: AS24 - SLE-Treatment Background/Purpose Although belimumab has shown efficacy and safety as an adjunct to standard therapies such as immunosuppressive agents in treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), its role as monotherapy is less well defined. Using data from a national belimumab registry, this study aims to assess whether the addition of immunosuppressive therapy (IS) to belimumab yields additional clinical benefits compared to belimumab monotherapy. Methods This retrospective longitudinal study analyzed data from the Spanish Belimumab Registry (BEL-Spain). Patients were included if they had completed at least 12 months of belimumab treatment and had documented data on the use of concomitant IS at the 12-month follow-up. Patients were grouped based on IS use at 12 months, and data from baseline, 6-month, and 12-month visits were analyzed. Outcomes assessed included the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), DORIS-21 remission criteria, physician-assessed response, flare rates (SFI), and glucocorticoid (GC) usage. To address potential confounding, given that patients receiving combined therapy (belimumab+IS) are more likely to have more severe disease, overlap propensity score (PS) weighting was performed. The PS for receiving combined treatment was estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model, which included covariates such as age, disease duration, baseline disease activity (SLEDAI), GC dose, and the number of flares prior to starting belimumab. The primary outcome was the rate of DORIS-21 remission after 12 months of belimumab treatment Results Of the 377 patients in the registry as of November 2024, 258 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 236 (91.5%) were female, and 218 (85.5%) were Caucasian. The mean age at belimumab initiation was 41.9 years (SD 12.6), with a mean disease duration of 11.4 years (SD 11). The baseline SLEDAI score was 11.8 (SD 10.5), and the mean SLICC Damage Index was 0.76 (SD 1.17). Of the 258 patients, 177 were receiving concomitant IS at 12 months, while 81 were not. Table 1 compares the 2 groups in terms of disease activity indices and treatment response. At 6 and 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in the number of flares (including severe flares), physician-assessed response, or response in terms of achieving a DORIS-21 or LLDAS status. Although the concomitant IS group had a higher baseline SLEDAI, the change over time was similar between groups. Regarding GC use, more patients in the IS group were receiving GCs; however, the average dose was comparable between groups. Figure 1 illustrates patient treatment trajectories based on the use of concomitant IS over 12 months. After applying overlap propensity score weighting, baseline covariates between the 2 groups were perfectly balanced. The percentage of patients achieving DORIS-21 remission after weighting was 25% vs 33% at 6 months, and 43% vs 46% at 12 months, in the IS and non-IS groups, respectively. Logistic regression analyses with overlap weighting yielded odds ratios (ORs) of 0.68 (95% CI 0.26–1.77, p 0.43) for DORIS-21 remission at 6 months, and 0.89 (95% CI 0.37–2.14, p 0.77) at 12 months. Table 1: Baseline Characteristics and Treatment Response in Patients Receiving Belimumab With or Without Concomitant Immunosuppressive Therapy at 12 Months. Figure 1: Patient treatment trajectories based on the use of concomitant IS over 12 months Conclusions According to BEL-Spain Registry data, the addition of concomitant IS to belimumab did not appears to confer major additional clinical benefits in terms of disease activity reduction, flare rate, or treatment response. These findings suggest that belimumab monotherapy may be a viable option for certain SLE patients. Prospective studies are needed to validate these observations and to identify patient subgroups who may benefit from combination therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".